Ray, when the claimer says "What? You're really going to make me try to run clubs when the jack doesn't come down?", 70D1 allows the director to consider whether not noticing its absence to date would be beyond merely careless or inferior.
70D1 says she does get to switch horses under some circumstances. The question is whether this player should be held to a standard of not noticing that the jack of clubs has not put in an appearance after three rounds of clubs. Is that just careless or inferior, or is ...
Sorry to all for the mess. This is all on me. I carelessly and stupidly applied the rule that bye teams don't get credit for a win for overall purposes to those teams who won one match in a four-way. Those teams do get credit for a win for ...
Not so fast, Crocodile Dundee. That's not a knife!
The Las Vegas NABC in the summer of 1991 routinely saw table counts double that number. Attendance for the ten day tournament was over 24,000 tables.
I am assuming that this whole discussion relates only to determining if a logical alternative exists. Of course the issue of demonstrably suggested needs to be dealt with separately.
The ACBL has specific instructions to TDs on this subject (dating back to 2008):
"When a player picks up his bidding cards from the table when he knows he has a turn coming and he INTENDS for that to be interpreted as a pass, then he has passed. When a ...
Directors should do the best they can under the circumstances and no particular number of polled players should be mandated. How is your average club director realistically supposed to find five people who are peers of the best player in the club?
By the way, in my world "director opinion ...
The question asked is not specific enough. If you are trying to determine if a player who made a bid in the face of unauthorized information should have been required to pass because the unauthorized information suggested not passing, three passers is clearly enough (and probably the first two would ...